/

Home

November 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            


About



Favorites

TEQUILACON - The Stories


Archives

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from runjenrun01. Make your own badge here.


Blog Pound


Links

? chicago blogs # >

\\ @ jennifers & //


Credits

Design by Web Divas

Design concept
and illustrations by
kris dresen

Powered by Laughing Squid

Powered by
Movable Type 3.15

RSS 1.0

RSS 2.0

Atom

 
© 2005-2008 Jenny Amadeo

 Subscribe in a reader

« Circle Gets the Square | Main | Harvest »

November 07, 2005

Cosmo Compatibility Study

By Dr. Jenny Amadeo, PhD, Human Relations and Sexual Development


I know what some of you are thinking. You’re saying to yourself, “Sure Jenny has a PhD in Human Relations and Sexual Development, but is that really even an actual area of specialization? And even if it is, how can she, with her PhD in Human Relations and Sexual Development, help me identify who I am most attracted to?”

Well, first of all, you ended that question with a preposition. But whatever. Secondly, I resent the implication that my degree is something I just made up on the “L” ride home last week. If you really knew what you were talking about, you would know that I don’t even take the “L” home anymore. I ride the Metra, as I have for almost the past year. So there goes your theory out the window.

Moving on to the second and actually sensible part of your question, you want to know how I can help you identify your ideal mate, is that right? Well, fortunately, most of you took the quiz from last week. If you didn’t, there’s still time, but only if you stop reading right now and go here. Then come back to us. Go. Now. Bunch of Johnny Come Lately’s.

For those of you who did take the quiz, I need to preface this report by saying that you may disagree with my findings, but just know that as a scientist, everything I tell you is truthful and accurate. I looked at the facts, followed the trends, analyzed and dissected the data, and discovered that all attraction comes down to simple choices.

Through your raw honesty and deep self-examination, you have helped further science in the area of Human Relations and Sexual Development. So I thank you all for your willing participation in this study, and must admit that I have never been more attracted to you than I am right at this moment. Call me?


The Rules of Attraction: Research Findings

METHODOLOGY
Subjects were placed in a controlled web-based environment and presented with a series of choices. They were instructed to select the option to which they found themselves most attracted. Choices were:


  1. Circle or square
  2. Bear or wolf
  3. Sun or moon
  4. Crocodile or cobra
  5. Solid, liquid or vapor

Results were tabulated and analyzed by an independent laboratory in a controlled whiskey-based environment in northern Chicago.


STATISTICS
Number of respondents (including Natasha and Dr. Amadeo):
30

Demographics:
Male = 23%
Female = 74%
Unknown = 3% (1 anonymous)

Responses:
Circle = 53%
Square = 47%

Bear = 55%
Wolf = 45%

Sun = 30%
Moon = 70%

Cobra = 52%
Crocodile = 48%

Solid = 21%
Liquid = 38%
Vapor = 41%

Most Popular Choices:
Circle
Bear
Moon
Cobra
Vapor


PERSONALITY TRAITS
At the most basic level, each option within these pairs is inherently either masculine or feminine.

Masculine:
Square
Bear
Sun
Crocodile
Solid

Feminine:
Circle
Wolf
Moon
Cobra
Liquid/Vapor

In addition, each option has certain personality traits associated with it, which drive our attraction toward each. Whether consciously or not, respondents found themselves drawn toward the characteristics that each of these options possess.

Square = stable, pragmatic, mechanical
Circle = emotional, open, artistic

Bear = fun-loving, outgoing, strong
Wolf = aloof, mysterious, wild

Sun = healthy, friendly, extroverted
Moon = romantic, elusive, noncommittal

Crocodile = aggressive, bold, athletic
Cobra = manipulative, clever, flexible

Solid = reliable, honest, rational
Liquid = adaptable, creative, passionate
Vapor = evasive, shy, mystical

As any good researcher on a tight budget will do, I used myself as the first subject, and my choices were Square, Wolf, Moon, Cobra, Liquid. This means that I am most attracted to people who are mechanical, mysterious, romantic, clever, and creative. “But, Jenny,” you’re thinking. “Some of these traits contradict each other. How can you be attracted to someone who’s both stable and elusive?”

And to that, my response is that clearly you and I have never dated, or you would know that I am attracted to all sorts of things that contradict each other. Be more attentive! Give me my space! Tell me how you feel! Stop being such a crybaby!


KEY FINDINGS
Based on their responses, study participants were grouped into three different categories based on the personality traits they find most attractive. This means that these individuals should all meet each other and hang out at the bars together, since they clearly are attracted to the same types of people. Or conversely, it means that they should avoid each other at all costs, for fear of having their mates stolen by backstabbing bloggers with similar tastes. (I only present the data, what you do with it is up to you.)

Please note: the label for each group indicates the type of person to whom they are most attracted, and does not necessarily reflect their own personality.

The Grounded
Kevin
Asia
Mateo

The Ethereal
Romy
Nicole
Shari
Tracy Kaply
Roy
Karen
Darby
Strode
Jessica
Dr. Amadeo

The Conflicted The Hermaphrodite The Balanced
Stationary Queen
Cee
The Scarlett
Number4of5
Sarah
Roxie
Christie
Nina
Junebug
Dr. G
Brando
Teahouseblossom
Fiorello La Guardia
Anonymous
Cheryl
Jill
Natasha

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Women like to take personality quizzes more than men.
  2. With a few notable exceptions (ahem…), the majority of respondents like structure and rules.
  3. Very few respondents are attracted to mates who are grounded.
  4. Many respondents seek conflict.
  5. Most bloggers fear the sun.
  6. My friend Vivian needs to change that "I don't like quizzes" attitude if she ever wants to meet someone nice.
  7. Respondents are mostly a bunch of softies and romantics.
  8. Nina is really impatient.
  9. I should really let my subscription to Cosmo run out.
  10. I think squares are hot.
  11. I would make out with a wolf, right here, right now.

My next study is about the effects of excessive blogging on libido, so if you are over the age of 21 and a non-smoker, please contact my research assistant to set up an appointment to participate in this important study.

Posted by runjenrun at November 7, 2005 06:39 AM

Comments

Sadly, I am a minority respondent. Shame, too.

C'est la vie.

Oh, and I'm 30 and a non smoker. Sign me up.

Hey, if I go to my HR Department, what are the odds that any of them will say that their degrees also covered Sexual Development? Or is this specific only to a select group of HR specialists?

Posted by: Kevin at November 6, 2005 05:59 PM

okay, okay, you can add: Nina is impatient and she is excessive in her blog-related activities but thankfully this has not (recently) affected her libido. In short: Nina is excessive.

Terrific analysis, btw. You have skills.

Posted by: nina at November 6, 2005 06:34 PM

If there were Oscars for blogging (and it's only a matter of time till there are), this would be Titanic. Except, like, it's actually good.

Posted by: Cheryl at November 6, 2005 08:43 PM

Holy crap! Spot on!

Posted by: Sarah at November 6, 2005 08:57 PM

Dear Jenny,

OK, OK. I am totally taking your next quiz. And I think you should be syndicated. Forget Ann Flanders. We want Dr. Amadeo!!!

Love,
Vivian

Posted by: Anonymous at November 6, 2005 09:27 PM

Holy shit, you are so dammit witty!! And, as fate would have it, I am good at laughing! So hanging out at bars together should work out well, just as you concluded. Damn, woman! You DO got some skee-ulz!

Oh, and I almost forgot: I am also exceptionally gifted at pouring and drinking scotch. See what I'm saying?

Posted by: shari at November 6, 2005 10:28 PM

I am deeply disturbed by my attraction to squares. Is there anything I do medically to return myself to normal circle-loving?

Posted by: Neil at November 7, 2005 07:01 AM

K: Well, fortunately, Human Resources and Human Relations have very little to do w/ one another, so I think your HR department will safely stay out of my area of expertise. But let me know if you see them trying to horn in on my territory, will you?

N: Every excess in moderation is the key to life, I always say.

C: Near. Far. Wherever you are, I believe that the blog will go on...

S: Yeah, I forgot to mention that people who like crocs are also strangely attracted to the Portuguese. Funny.

V: So now you're all about the quizzes, huh? Well it's high time, sister! Welcome to the dark side.

S: And the good thing is, you're already spoken for, so I don't have to worry about you going after my square wolves.

N: Well, Neil. There are some people who think that loving squares is a choice, and that you can be "re-educated" to start loving circles. Personally, I think you're born a square lover, and should just embrace that. I also think squares should be able to marry squares, but don't get me started on that topic...

Posted by: jenny at November 7, 2005 07:14 AM

Wow, Dr. Amadeo - fantastic study. Also, I was very interested in the fact that, other than liquid/vapor, we had the exact same choices. Good thing I'm married because, when I come to Chicago in a few weeks, you would either:

A) Be insanely attracted to me, or
B) Try to steal every guy to whom I was attracted (NOW where's the prepositional ending, huh? HUH?!).

Posted by: Jessica at November 7, 2005 08:28 AM

J: The guys to whom you're attracted are heretofore fair game in so much as the aforementioned marriage precludes you from pursuing further opportunities such that might result in or reasonably indicate an affection to, or for, the parties named under subsection (d). Further, the term "insanely attracted to" indicates a state of mind which upon further review, shall not be levied upon bloggers unless consistent with section (ii) and agreed upon by all interested parties, except to the extent that such notices are in accordance with Article C.

Huh?

Posted by: Jenny at November 7, 2005 02:17 PM

Jen, now you know how attorneys feel. We're so misunderstood....

***sob***

Posted by: shari at November 7, 2005 05:07 PM

Dear Dr. Amadeo...can you define "conflicted" a little for me? I thought I was attracted to my husband because he was "grounded." Just sign me...

Worried in Wisconsin

Posted by: Fiorello La Guardia at November 7, 2005 08:28 PM

Dear Worried:

No need to worry. I'm sure your husband is grounded. You just aren't really attracted to him, according to my research. Ha. Just a little PhD humor. Ahem.

A few other people have expressed their concern with the term "Conflicted." It means conflicted only in the sense that they do not possess primarily masculine or primarily feminine traits, but are a blend of both. It has been suggested that I change the label, so to appease the masses, I will change the label to "Hermaphrodite."

Keep those questions coming!

Posted by: jenny at November 7, 2005 08:34 PM

very interesting, dr amadeo !
i am attracted to ethereal men. in fact, i prefer being able to see right through them.

btw i wholly endorse this site as the titanic of blogging awards. :)

Posted by: romy at November 7, 2005 08:40 PM

No matter how many times I tell your comments page to remember me I get the blank stare. everytime.

I heart grounded? I am not suprised. I never did grow roots and got tangled with someone who never grew trailing vines. Hooray for science!!!

Posted by: asia at November 8, 2005 03:34 AM

Dear Dr. Jenny,
This entire "Hermaphrodite" thing has taken me by surprise! I suggest you check your data as the majority of those you studied fell into that category; oh, and I suggest that you not visit websites based upon the Google search of the phrase, "Hermaphrodite Statistics" because you will be asking for trouble.


I agree that you should be syndicated in spite of this hermaphrodite debacle.

Posted by: The Scarlett at November 8, 2005 08:47 AM

R: I think I kind of like the idea of this blog as a luxurious, overpriced, entertaining sinking ship.

A: The remember me problem will seriously push me over the edge! I spent hours trying to fix the problem - there's some bug w/ Movable Type that should be able to be fixed easily, but I'm just dumb and can't figure it out. Drives me nuts! If any smart people can email me advice, I'll dedicate my next paint-by-number to you...

TS: Why are you hatin' on the hermaphrodites? You don't like conflicted. You don't like hermaphrodite. Okay - how about "balanced?" Is that better? Boring, but better. (But oh, the temptation to google hermaphrodite stats is great...)

Posted by: jenny at November 8, 2005 09:13 AM

You know...no matter who I'm attracted to, I take great comfort in the fact that at least I'm perfect... ;)

Posted by: sandra at November 8, 2005 09:53 AM

I'm not a Hermaphrodite Hater (HH). In fact, I'm entirely pro-hermaphrodite. If there was a hermaphrodite next to me right now, I'd hug him/her.

I'll take balanced. As a Libra, balanced is satisfying. You might say I'm a balance-freak, that is, if you were a Libra Hater (LH).

Posted by: The Scarlett at November 8, 2005 11:54 AM

S: You should just make sure you never date another person who is perfect - it rarely works out. Look what happened to Brad and Gwyneth.

TS: Thank you for the clarification! And I would never call you a freak! But if you keep running around town hugging hermaphrodites, people might start to talk. I'm totally cool with it, but I'm just saying.

Posted by: jenny at November 8, 2005 12:21 PM

I have to say, I was at odds with the term conflicted and leaning towards the more positive balance, but now that I've got it. . . I just don't know. Conflicted is sexy. Balance, as you say, boring unless you're on a high wire. And then that's where the hermanintites come in. Of course, we're not talking about me, but about my ONE TRUE LOVE. And. . . oh crap. Now I'm confused.

(P.S. Such a fabulously great study, Dr. J. Really, scarily right on. I think. Um, there's a privacy clause, right?)

Posted by: jill at November 9, 2005 10:10 AM

Most bloggers fear the sun. HA!

:)

Great stuff. Learned a lot here.

Posted by: StationeryQueen at November 9, 2005 07:14 PM